Lire cette analyse en français
Major League Soccer
Chicago Fire—New England Revolution
· Soldier Field
What the model reads
60%Both teams to score
A probability, not a prediction: 60% means the opposite outcome happens about 40% of the time. This number was published before kick-off and is judged against the final score in public.
- CHI
- 47%
- Draw
- 24%
- ENG
- 29%
- Data quality behind this analysis
- 80%
- Reliability measured in this competition
- Not measured here yet — under twenty judged analyses, a gap is sample noise
Most probable scorelines
Together these cover 43% of what could happen. A single scoreline stays an unlikely event even when it is the most likely one — which is why the figure never travels without its probability.
What supports it
- Chicago Fire's attack: better than ~92% of the teams in the league
- New England Revolution has 6 declared absences
What could mislead us
- Chicago Fire has 6 declared absences
- 6 draws in the last 8 meetings — a historically tight fixture
The full analysis of Chicago Fire — New England Revolution
Five tabs — the reasoning market by market, the lineups and their effect, the gap against the margin-free consensus, the context, and how the analysis moved — plus the live state during the match. A free account opens them. It never unlocks different numbers: everyone reads the same probabilities.
GrabbleStats publishes model probabilities, confidence levels and data-quality indicators. It is an analysis tool, not betting advice, and it promises no accuracy, certainty or gain. Strictly reserved for adults.